More Pages: Johnson Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


thought-provoking look at arcane science

Great for intermediate players

From a Computer Scientist to Cognitive Scientists

Great love story and adventure story in one. I loved it!

With gorgeous color photographs

Good healthy downhome cooking

Concise, good diagrams, good practice questions

You owe your familyBut your book will be of interest to more than just your immediate family. A lot of people have your family name. Put a price on your new book and use a program such as ProPhone that has all the addresses of everyone with a telephone. Just type in your last name and harvest the mailing list. And-become a publisher.
If you add an International Standard Book Number and a barcode to your book, you may sell it through Amazon.com just as Jennifer Sheppard's book is being offered here. And--become an entrepreneur.
Genealogy & Self-Publishing covers record keeping, research, writing your family history and publishing it. This step-by-step guide is fun to read.
Jennifer Modlin Sheppard teaches genealogy and has a certificate in Family History Research from Brigham Young University. She has written and published several books and articles on family histories. She wrote and published this book to be used as a text in her classes. It contains everything you will need and everything she wants you to have.
As a publisher, author of 113 nonfiction books (including revisions and foreign-language editions) and over 500 magazine articles, I recognize the value of recording details of our families before they are lost. DanPoynter@ParaPublishing.com.


(Straight white) women, class mattersThis book successfully helps to shatter the myths that America has no class, that everyone is "middle-class," and that any American can make it out of poverty. The Horatio Alger and Betty Boop myths are just that: most working-class women grew up working-class, marry working-class men, and never leave that class.
This book was a sharp example of sociology at its best. In the book, theory and real life compliment each other. Thinkers often forget everyday folk and everyday folk don't read theory. Still, Johnson is able to explain how academic theories apply to real women and real women often think the same things about their lives that academics conclude. Johnson has the ability to be critical of her subjects' thoughts at the same time that she lets their voices come through respectfully and clearly. I am not sure if the subjects would be able to read this book. However, this book would be pretty accessible to many, if not most, readers.
All feminist activists, anti-classist activists, progressive thinkers and human resources wonks must read this book. This was an incredible addition to the burgeoning collection of intersectional studies of women. Too, this was an interesting look at Baltimore and important for people who want to think critically about labor matters.
Though I'm giving this book five stars, I do have criticisms of the text. For example, Johnson introduces a term "gray-collar" which is meant differ from white-, blue-, or pink-collar, yet the term is not well-defined. While Johnson quotes from many other women's statistical works, for the most part, she resorts to classic male theorists (Marx, Weber, Bourdieu, etc.) for most of her support. I found this odd coming from someone who seems so feminist. Further, she sometimes introduces topics that upon which I wish she would have expanded (how racial intergration made some class-disadvantaged white females not want to finish high school and how unions have a masculinist, exclusive vibe, for examples).
Most importantly, I am displeased about Johnson's rigidly narrow interview pool. The title of this book says "working-class women," yet in the first chapter, Johnson clearly states that she only means white women. Moreover, she adds insult to injury by stating that she is only interviewing whites because there's already enough research about black women and Latinas out there. Further, she only interviews women with "partners." Though she uses this gender-neutral term for subjects and herself, no one here has a female partner or identifies as lesbian or bisexual. Johnson implies that she comes from the relatively-homogenous Australia and that her partner is male, so I wonder if she only wanted to interview women of the same race and sexual orientation as herself. She should not have titled this book "working-class women" if she only meant "working-class, STRAIGHT, WHITE women." I think a study of how class affects women of color, bisexual women, and lesbians would only add to a healthy discussion, not subtract from it. I found the author's perspective somewhat disturbing, and bordering on heterosexist and white-supremacist.


the giant squid (a review)